penthouse at 150 Chambers is new + outdoorsy

[update 12.1.08: I have restored this post (below), as the reasons for having removed it in April no longer obtain]
I have removed the content of this blog post, as it comments about the current listing of another agent. For information about why, check out end of an era for Manhattan Loft Guy / a new day dawns? from April 9.
 

[The original post:]

 

outdoor space is how big a plus?
The Penthouse W at 150 Chambers Street is new to market today, asking $2.1mm and $1,388/mo (condo) for "1,500 sq ft" inside and a private "400 sq ft" private roof deck.

This is a classic Long-and-Narrow footprint, with just the 4 windows in front and 4 in back, with the plumbing in the middle. At just over 22 feet wide, there is not  a lot of flexibility in the layout – though it should not need flexibility as it has been "newly renovated". (I have a lot of trouble finding "1,500 sq ft" based on the dimensions given, but maybe….)

The ceiling "soar[s] up to 14 feet tall", which makes me wonder if it is a different height in different parts of the loft. The "large" windows look to be kind of small for a loft building (maybe the soaring ceilings are throwing me off). Unless I am turned around, the single building photo on the web listing is a ‘view shot’ of the building across the street; I am pretty sure this building is a beautiful old loft building with very tall windows on the 2d floor, smaller ones on the 3rd and 4th floors, and still smaller windows on the top floor.

is history a guide?
The Penthouse unit next door (Penthouse E) sold a year ago after 7 months on the market, 2 firms and 2 price drops, from $2mm to $1.895mm, to $1.795mm. The clearing price was $1.685mm for a unit that sounds like the same size as Penthouse W, the same condition, and also with a private roof deck.

That Penthouse E price is hard to reconcile with the history of Unit #4E, which sold very quickly for $1.61mm in 2005 ($110k above the asking price). That unit may or may have been in the same (excellent) condition as the two penthouses, but had no outdoor space.

whose anomaly?
Penthouse W is priced as though Penthouse E at $1.685mm one year ago was the anomalous price, rather than #4E 2.5 years ago at $1.61mm. We’ll see what The Market thinks…. [update 12.1.08: it closed June 12 at $2.025mm; they were right about The Market]

© Sandy Mattingly 2008

Tagged with: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply