why be that negotiable in secret? 25 Ann Street closed nearly 25% off ask
broader point about psychology
Using this painful Manhattan loft story as a jumping off point, this scenario shows the danger of coming to market at a price far removed from where buyers are: you don’t get any offers and you probably get little or no open house traffic or phone call inquiries. Then a low-ball offer comes in and a (now, very motivated) seller deals with the only person willing to pay any money for the loft. The owner then runs the risk of losing this low-ball-bidder if they publicly adjust the price and continue marketing, so the temptation is to simply strike the best deal possible with the only one interested.
Had the owner priced closer to The Market, there might well have been other bidders (even if throwing low balls); had the owner priced at The Market, there might well have been higher bids than the solo low ball.
Manifestly, if a low ball bidder was willing to pay $1.8mm (off an ask of $2.35mm), that bidder started even lower … maybe $1.65mm. Other people who may have been interested in the loft if they knew the owner would entertain around $2mm would probably have emerged if only they had been aware. This kind of a spread between Bid, Ask and Clearing is very dangerous to sellers.
© Sandy Mattingly 2009
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow Us!